Thanks Pete, I needed those answers to
make the point(.)s that I want to make.
One point is that I speak from a reality
where I have divine experiences and so
for me it is easy to speak from that
reality where this God who speaks to me
exists. For me that is like taking an ice
cube, having it in my hands and say:
yeah this is ice.... And you have a reality
where you do not have, or do not notice
those sensorial spiritual experiences,
and this results in an: I believe when I
see, and then what I see must be
if possible on demand.
Those are the: I see so I believe(rs).
it must be something with a logical
explanation. In such a way that maybe I
can't see it, however there is proof it
exists. Like Higgs Bosons where you don;t
see the particle itself, but you can find,
hidden in the noise, statistics of an
expected signature of its interaction with
other particles. And then from hearsay
we believe "they" "found" it. Why should
Those are the: I understand so I believe(rs).
There are the see and interpret people.
Funny thing is that they proof the boson
exists, not because they found it, no, they
believe it exists because they sail on the
probability that whatever result they
found proofs it unlikely, five sigma, that
it doesn't exist.
Serious. It is not
uncommon what I described with that
house building on rocks you can't see.
huh. And to us who don't understand they
say: We found it! I tell ye, there is no
such thing as a Higgs Boson! Do you
disbelieve now because I said so?
They call it the god-particle anyways.
CERN has also a signature of religion.
This article explains this.
https://understandinguncertainty.org/ex ... id-they-do
So expensive "houses" like CERN are being
built upon faith. Faith that may one day
result to be quicksand.
Not my problem so much, my problem is
with faith. I know that faith is essential
for a next step that leads to either an I
see experience, or an I understand
experience. And what I see, also from what
you just said proofs my suspicions, is that
people can't get to faith. You have the
people who believe without seeing. And
you have the people who don't and who
will never believe.
There is a faith chasm fixed between those
people and the possible divine experience.
The experience that will make them
become the believer through seeing or
through understanding. Like in the Higgs
I can clearly see that Medjugorje visions
do not convert anybody who is not already
prone to be a believer. At most the visions
will strengthen what is already there.
To the church: You can prohibit relativism,
call it dictatorship or whatever, but you can
never make people stop thinking.
Relativizing is a strong tool that makes the
essential float to the surface. Why would
you want to stop people from doing that?
Or why would you want people to stop
doing that selectively?
Talking to God. What do you want? Do
you not love these? You will have to come
up with something more that this.
Something that transcends. Or do you
think that the people whom you reach is
the people that you wanted to reach
Talking to Mary (Gospa). Do you have any
force left? You showed me in a vision
that the price of these public visions is
incredibly high, and is paid with blood
sacrifice and incredible sufferings. Is it
worth it or are you pressing me?
My Jesus says to me: My God, the Father and I, ... we love everybody..., yes even the sinners. Be assured however that we are not in love with everybody. Therefore I ask you to question yourself: Is God in love with me?